A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-April/152674.html below:

[Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?

[Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI? [Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Apr 8 04:43:23 EDT 2018
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:17:36 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 April 2018 at 14:45, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > As you may guess from the silence, it may be hard to get a definitive answer
> > to this question -- PEP 384's author has stopped actively participating in
> > the Python community and I'm not sure if any core developers currently
> > consider themselves to be the "guardians of the ABI".  
> 
> It's only been a few days, and there are definitely some of us that
> genuinely want the stable ABI to meet its guarantees (e.g. me, Steve
> Dower, Eric Snow, Victor Stinner). It just isn't likely to come fully
> into its own until more library developers are able to drop support
> for Python 2.7.

Note there are issues with PyType_FromSpec() which make the stable ABI
rather delicate to use:
https://bugs.python.org/issue15727
https://bugs.python.org/issue16690

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4