RetroSearch Browse

Fri Sep 29 10:44:12 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149648.html

Hi all,

Do the accepted PEP were 552, not 550?

Thanks,
Louie.

2017-09-29 22:40 GMT+08:00 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>:
> It's Friday!
>
> There have been no further comments. PEP 550 is now accepted.
>
> Congrats, Benjamin! Go ahead and send your implementation for review.
>
> --Guido
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>>
>> I've read the current version of PEP 552 over and I think everything looks
>> good for acceptance. I believe there are no outstanding objections (or they
>> have been adequately addressed in responses).
>>
>> Therefore I intend to accept PEP 552 this Friday, unless grave objections
>> are raised on this mailing list (python-dev).
>>
>> Congratulations Benjamin. Gotta love those tristate options!
>>
>> --
>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/me%40louie.lu
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149648.html below:

[Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files)