Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149305.html below:

[Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Map and Wirelessly Control the Human Brain Using 50 Nanometer Particles and Radio Waves
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This is now in git master after being merged by Victor in
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/3385.

Regards

Antoine.


On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:36:51 +0200
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> It's 2017 and we are still allowing people to compile CPython without
> threads support.  It adds some complication in several places
> (including delicate parts of our internal C code) without a clear
> benefit.  Do people still need this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antoine.
> 
> 

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Map and Wirelessly Control the Human Brain Using 50 Nanometer Particles and Radio Waves
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4