Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-September/149238.html below:

[Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm strongly in favor of dropping this option from Python 3.7. It
> would remove a lot of code!

+1

Do we still have buildbots for testing the --without-threads option?

--Berker

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compiling without multithreading support -- still useful?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4