RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 26 22:01:12 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149994.html

On Oct 26, 2017, at 06:15, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think that Mailman 3 gives the choice of the UI for archives.

Technically, it does.

Mailman 3 has a pluggable architecture and supports multiple archives enabled site-wide and opt-in by individual lists.  HyperKitty is the default archiver, and the one we promote, but it doesn’t have to be the only archiver enabled.  In fact, we come with plugins for mail-archive.com and MHonarc.  It *might* even be possible to enable a standalone Pipermail and route messages to that if one were so inclined.  The choice of archivers is not mutually exclusive.

Practically speaking though, there just aren’t a ton of well maintained FLOSS archivers to choose from.  HyperKitty *is* well maintained.  Frankly speaking, Pipermail is not.

Cheers,
-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171026/cf1e9cb6/attachment.sig>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149994.html below:

[Python-Dev] Migrate python-dev to Mailman 3?