On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 5:53:58 PM EDT Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> No, but the last time I suggested that that datetime types should
> satisfy the same invariants as numbers, namely
> T(repr(x)) == x, the idea was met will silence. I, on the other hand,
> am not very enthusiastic about named constructors such as
> date.isoparse(). Compared with date(s:str), this is one more method
> name to remember, plus the potential for abuse as an instance method.
> What is d.isoparse('2017-11-24')?
Agreed. datetime(s:str) seems like a far more natural and consistent
choice.
Elvis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4