RetroSearch Browse

Sat Oct 21 14:23:55 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149929.html

If it sounds as there is no need or is unnecessary to you then
it its ok :-), thank you for the feedback ! I'm just curious on:

On 10/21/2017 05:45 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> That sounds like unnecessary generality, 
Meaning that the selection of precision on running time 'costs'?

I understand that one can just multiply/divide the nanoseconds returned,
(or it could be a factory) but wouldn't it help for future enhancements
to reduce the number of functions (the 'pico' question)?

> and also suggests that the API
> might support precisions way beyond what is realistic.
Doesn't that depends on the offered/supported enums (in that case down
to 'ns' as Victor proposed) ?

Thanks,
--francis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149929.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution