RetroSearch Browse

Sat Oct 21 07:39:38 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149927.html

Hi Victor,

On 10/18/2017 01:14 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> I updated my PEP 564 to add time.process_time_ns():
> https://github.com/python/peps/blob/master/pep-0564.rst
> 
> The HTML version should be updated shortly:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0564/

** In practive, the resolution of 1 nanosecond **

** no need for resolution better than 1 nanosecond in practive in the
Python standard library.**

practice vs practice

If I understood you correctly on Python-ideas (here just for the
records, otherwise please ignore it):

why not something like (please change '_in' for what you like):

time.time_in(precision)
time.monotonic_in(precision)

where precision is an enumeration for: 'seconds', 'milliseconds'
'microseconds'... (or 's', 'ms', 'us', 'ns', ...)

Thanks,
--francis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149927.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution