RetroSearch Browse

Mon Oct 16 13:20:44 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149876.html

Oh, now I'm confused. I misunderstood your previous message. I understood
that you changed you mind and didn't want to add process_time_ns().

Can you elaborate why you consider that time.process_time_ns() is needed,
but not the nanosecond flavor of os.times() nor resource.getrusage()? These
functions use the same or similar clock, no?

Depending on platform, time.process_time() may be implemented with
resource.getrusage(), os.times() or something else.

Victor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171016/526c2c2d/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149876.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution