RetroSearch Browse

Mon Oct 16 12:53:11 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149872.html

Makes sense, thanks. -Ben

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2017-10-16 18:14 GMT+02:00 Ben Hoyt <benhoyt at gmail.com>:
> > Got it -- fair enough.
> >
> > We deploy so often where I work (a couple of times a week at least) that
> 104
> > days seems like an eternity. But I can see where for a very stable file
> > server or something you might well run it that long without deploying.
> Then
> > again, why are you doing performance tuning on a "very stable server"?
>
> I'm not sure of what you mean by "performance *tuning*". My idea in
> the example is more to collect live performance metrics to make sure
> that everything is fine on your "very stable server". Send these
> metrics to your favorite time serie database like Gnocchi, Graphite,
> Graphana or whatever.
>
> Victor
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171016/336adbb1/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149872.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 564: Add new time functions with nanosecond resolution