Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-October/149846.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What is the design purpose of metaclasses vs code generating decorators? (was Re: PEP 557: Data Classes)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 10/14/2017 11:30 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:

> As a side note, I don't think elimination of metaclasses should be a "goal by itself".
> This is a powerful and flexible mechanism, but there are specific situations where
> metaclasses don't work well because of e.g. frequent conflicts or performance penalties.

+1

--
~Ethan~

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 560 vs metaclass' class definition protections [was Re: What is the design purpose of metaclasses ...]
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What is the design purpose of metaclasses vs code generating decorators? (was Re: PEP 557: Data Classes)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4