On 10/12/2017 6:33 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com > <mailto:steve at holdenweb.com>> wrote: > > The reason I liked "row" as a name is because it resembles > "vector" and hence is loosely assocaited with the concept of a tuple > as well as being familiar to database users. In fact the answer to a > relational query was, I believe, originally formally defined as a > set of tuples. > > > Is the intent that these things preserve order? In the sense that the parameters to __init__(), the appearance in the repr, the order of the returned tuple in as_tuple(), and the order of comparisons will be the same as the order that the fields are defined, then yes. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4