On Nov 29, 2017, at 12:40, David Mertz <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote: > I think some syntax could be possible to only "catch" some exceptions and let others propagate. Maybe: > > val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except (AttributeError, KeyError): -1 > > I don't really like throwing a colon in an expression though. Perhaps some other word or symbol could work instead. How does this read: > > val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except -1 in (AttributeError, KeyError) I don’t know whether I like any of this <wink> but I think a more natural spelling would be: val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except (AttributeError, KeyError) as -1 which could devolve into: val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except KeyError as -1 or: val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except KeyError # Implicit `as None` I would *not* add any spelling for an explicit bare-except equivalent. You would have to write: val = name.strip()[4:].upper() except Exception as -1 Cheers, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171129/b59046e8/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4