RetroSearch Browse

Tue Nov 28 15:17:57 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150916.html

Please, not for 3.7. I think it will be very difficult to get consensus
about this, and I personally feel something like +/- zero about it --
sometimes I think it makes sense, sometimes I think we're jumping the shark
here.

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Lukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> it looks like the PEP is dormant for over two years now. I had multiple
> people ask me over the past few days about it though, so I wanted to ask if
> this is moving forward.
>
> I also cc python-dev to see if anybody here is strongly in favor or
> against this inclusion. If the idea itself is uncontroversial, I could
> likely find somebody interested in implementing it. If not for 3.7 then at
> least for 3.8.
>
> - Ł
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> guido%40python.org
>
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171128/0d4769a1/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150916.html below:

[Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?