This may have gotten bogged down again. Could we get the output of datetime.isoformat() parsed at a minimum? Perfection is not required. Looks like there is a patch or two and test cases on the bug. -Mike > Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format date-times > on the front burner? > > http://bugs.python.org/issue15873 > > In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations that > bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of > datetime.isoformat(): > > >>> dt.isoformat() > '2017-10-20T08:20:08.986166+00:00' > > Perhaps if we could get that minimum first step in, it could be iterated on and > made more lenient in the future. >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4