A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150911.html below:

[Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing

[Python-Dev] iso8601 parsing [Python-Dev] iso8601 parsingMike Miller python-dev at mgmiller.net
Tue Nov 28 14:51:14 EST 2017
This may have gotten bogged down again.  Could we get the output of 
datetime.isoformat() parsed at a minimum?  Perfection is not required.

Looks like there is a patch or two and test cases on the bug.

-Mike


> Could anyone put this five year-old bug about parsing iso8601 format date-times 
> on the front burner?
> 
>      http://bugs.python.org/issue15873
> 
> In the comments there's a lot of hand-wringing about different variations that 
> bogged it down, but right now I only need it to handle the output of 
> datetime.isoformat():
> 
>      >>> dt.isoformat()
>      '2017-10-20T08:20:08.986166+00:00'
> 
> Perhaps if we could get that minimum first step in, it could be iterated on and 
> made more lenient in the future.
> 
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4