Guido van Rossum wrote: > > The debugger does stop at each iteration. It does see a local named ".0" > I suppose there currently is no way for the debugger to map the variable > names to what they are named in the source, right? If the hidden local were named "a.0" where "a" is the original name, mapping it back would be easy. It would also be easily understood even if it weren't mapped back. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4