Paul Moore wrote: > has anyone confirmed > why a function scope was considered necessary at the time of the > original implementation, but it's apparently not now? At the time I got the impression that nobody wanted to spend the time necessary to design and implement a subscope mechanism. What's changed is that we now have someone offering to do that. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4