On 23 November 2017 at 15:37, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 11/22/2017 11:51 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote: > >> A "yield" within a comprehension is like a "return" in a comprehension. It >> makes no sense at all. >> Also a "yield" and a "return with value" is also rarely seen. >> >> Comprehensions build new objects, they are not for control flow, IMO. > > > +1 That isn't a principle I've seen described explicitly before, but I agree it makes sense to me. So +1 here as well. And yes, I know this might seem to contradict my position that comprehensions translate to loops, but remember that the translation is a mental model, not an exact definition (to my way of thinking). Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4