On 23 November 2017 at 10:50, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 November 2017 at 09:14, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > > I would urge developers, in their improvements to the language to support > > asynchronous programming, to bear in mind that this is (currently) a > > minority use case. Why the rush to set complex semantics in stone? > > +1 > > Also, given that languages like C# have similar async/await > functionality, I'd be interested to know how they address questions > like this. If they have a parallel, we should probably follow it. If > they don't that would be further indication that no-one has much > experience of the "best answers" yet, and caution is indicated. > > Keeping this open for indefinite time is also not a good option. Note that the issue about `yield` in comprehensions https://bugs.python.org/issue10544 is 7 (seven) years old. I don't say that we should fix it _right now_, but I think it makes sense to spend some time and finally resolve it. -- Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171123/56cd89c9/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4