Paul Moore wrote: > At the moment, I know I tend to treat Python semantics as I always > did, but with an implicit proviso, "unless async is involved, when I > can't assume any of my intuitions apply". That's *not* a good > situation to be in. It's disappointing that PEP 3152 was rejected, because I think it would have helped people like you by providing a mental model for async stuff that's much easier to reason about. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4