RetroSearch Browse

Wed Nov 22 16:25:55 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150726.html

22 Лис 2017 22:19 "Ethan Furman" <ethan at stoneleaf.us> пише:

On 11/22/2017 11:01 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:

I think how to formulate these rules more "precisely" so that they will be
> all consistent even if there is a
> `yield` inside.
> The key idea is that neither comprehensions nor generator expressions
> should create a function scope surrounding the
> `expr` in (expr for ind in iterable) and [expr for ind in iterable].
> (this still can be some hidden implementation detail)
>
> So as Serhiy proposed in one of his first posts any comprehensions and
> generator expressions with `yield` are not valid
> outside functions.
> If such comprehension or generator expression is inside a function, then
> it makes it a generator, and all the `yield`s
>
> are yielded from that generator, for example:
>

Whether it's inside or outside a function should be irrelevant -- a
comprehension / generator expression should have no influence on the type
of the resulting function (and at least synchronous comprehensions /
generator expressions should be able to live outside of a function).

def fun_gen():
>      return list((yield i) for i in range(3))
>

The return says it's returning a list, so that's what it should be returning

def f():
    yield 1
    return list()

Here return also says it should return a list, so this is not an argument.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171122/35c47ebe/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150726.html below:

[Python-Dev] Tricky way of of creating a generator via a comprehension expression