On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 November 2017 at 20:05, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jelle Zijlstra < >> jelle.zijlstra at gmail.com> wrote >> >>> 2017-11-22 9:58 GMT-08:00 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>: >>> >> (OTOH, await in the same position must keep working since it's not broken >>> and not unintuitive either.) >>> >> >> > > This is very questionable IMO. > So do you think that [await x for y in z] and list(await x for y in z) > being not equivalent is intuitive? > I see, that's why this is such a long thread. :-( But are they different? I can't find an example where they don't give the same outcome. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171122/3605a096/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4