On 22 November 2017 at 20:05, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra at gmail.com > > wrote > >> 2017-11-22 9:58 GMT-08:00 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>: >> > (OTOH, await in the same position must keep working since it's not broken >> and not unintuitive either.) >> > > This is very questionable IMO. So do you think that [await x for y in z] and list(await x for y in z) being not equivalent is intuitive? -- Ivan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171122/54416038/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4