2017-11-16 13:43 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <antoine at python.org>: >> About asyncio debug mode, if it's too expensive to be used to develop >> an application, maybe there is an issue with additional checks? Should >> we remove some of them to be able to use asyncio debug mode in more >> cases? > > Well, I'm sure some people like them, otherwise they wouldn't have been > added to the codebase in the first place :-) For example, knowing where > a Future was created can make debug logs much more informative. The most expensive part of asyncio debug mode is the code to extracts the current stack when a coroutine or a handle is created. Would it make sense to modify asyncio debug mode to skip the traceback by default, but add a second debug level which extracts the traceback? Victor
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4