Am 14.11.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Guido van Rossum: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Sebastian Rittau <srittau at rittau.biz > <mailto:srittau at rittau.biz>> wrote: > > I am really looking forward to the implementation of this PEP and > I am glad that it is close to acceptance. One thing that is not > really clear to me is how module-only packages are handled. Say I > have a package "foo" that installs the file "foo.py" to > site-packages, where would I install "foo.pyi" and py.typed to? Or > is this case not supported and I have to convert the foo module > into a package containing just __init__.py? > > > Good call. I think that conversion to a package is indeed the best > approach -- it doesn't seem worth it to add more special-casing for > this scenario. > > Ethan, if you agree, you should just add a sentence about this to the PEP. > This seems like the best solution, especially since setuptools does not really support installing package data for pure modules. - Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171114/4f0c1f3b/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4