Hello everyone, Am 14.11.2017 um 00:29 schrieb Guido van Rossum: > This is a nice piece of work. I expect to accept it pretty much > verbatim (with some small edits, see > https://github.com/python/peps/pull/467). I agree with Nick that we > don't have to do anything specifically about control of foo_stubs > packages -- nor do I think we need to worry about foo_stubs vs. foo-stubs. > > Everyone else: if you think this should not go through, now's the time > to reply-all here! I am really looking forward to the implementation of this PEP and I am glad that it is close to acceptance. One thing that is not really clear to me is how module-only packages are handled. Say I have a package "foo" that installs the file "foo.py" to site-packages, where would I install "foo.pyi" and py.typed to? Or is this case not supported and I have to convert the foo module into a package containing just __init__.py? - Sebastian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4