On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 11/10/2017 07:48 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I don't mind the long name. Of all the options so far I really only like >> 'string_annotations' so let's go with that. >> > > As someone else mentioned, we have function annotations and variable > annotations already, which makes string_annotations sound like it's > annotations for strings. > > > Contriwise, "annotation_strings" sounds like a different type of > annotation -- they are now being stored as strings, instead of something > else. > > Or a step further (longer), with annotations_as_strings. ––Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven + -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171110/30540143/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4