RetroSearch Browse

Thu Nov 9 21:11:53 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150440.html

On 10 November 2017 at 05:51, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> If we have to change the name I'd vote for string_annotations -- "lazy" has
> too many other connotations (e.g. it might cause people to think it's the
> thunks). I find str_annotations too abbreviated, and stringify_annotations
> is too hard to spell.

Aye, I'd be fine with "from __future__ import string_annotations" -
that's even more explicitly self-documenting than either of my
suggestions.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150440.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations