On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.bray at gmail.com> wrote: >> a platform--in particular it's not clear when a buildbot is considered >> "stable", or how to achieve that without getting necessary fixes >> merged into the main branch in the first place. > > I think in this context, "stable" just means "keeps a connection to > the buildbot master and doesn't blow up when told to build" :). As > such, I'm ready to get you added to the fleet whenever you are. "Doesn't blow up when told to build" is the tricky part, because there are a few tests that are known to cause the test suite process to hang until killed. It's not clear to me whether, even with the --timeout option, that the test runner will kill hanging processes (I haven't actually tried this though so I'll double-check, but I'm pretty sure it does not). So until at least those issues are resolved I'd be hesitate to call it "stable". Thanks, Erik
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4