Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150417.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I did not assume totally opaque -- but code objects are not very 
> introspection friendly (and they have no strong compatibility guarantees).

If I understand the proposal correctly, there wouldn't be any
point in trying to introspect the lambdas/thunks/whatever.
They're only there to provide a level of lazy evaluation.
You would evaluate them and then introspect the returned
data structure.

-- 
Greg

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 563: Postponed Evaluation of Annotations
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4