RetroSearch Browse

Tue Nov 7 21:27:53 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150369.html

Thanks for the reminder! I don't know if it's that simple -- did you grep
for occurrences of that flag (CO_FUTURE_GENERATOR_STOP)? And I suppose
there are tests for both sides that need to be adjusted?

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Lukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:

> This is according to https://www.python.org/dev/
> peps/pep-0479/#transition-plan but looking at Objects/genobject.c that
> hasn't been implemented yet. Is this as simple as removing the `else`
> clause here?
>
> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Objects/
> genobject.c#L277-L298
>
> - Ł
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171107/3f3c9d73/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150369.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reminder: PEP 479's future about to become the default behavior

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150369.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reminder: PEP 479's __future__ about to become the default behavior

[Python-Dev] Reminder: PEP 479's future about to become the default behavior