On 7 November 2017 at 21:13, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote: > the "only until first deletion" part is really hard -- I hope we don't go > that route. But I don't think insertion-order is non-obvious -- particularly > with literals. But I thought we *had* gone that route. Actually, there's no "route" to go here. We're only talking about documenting the existing semantics that cPython has, and I thought that included no longer guaranteeing insertion order after a delete. Although I can't prove that by experiment at the moment. I don't know whether my confusion above is an argument for or against documenting the behaviour :-) Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4