RetroSearch Browse

Tue Nov 7 02:39:24 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150292.html

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 05:28:24PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 7 November 2017 at 16:21, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:05:07PM -0800, David Mertz wrote:
> >> Maybe OrderedDict can be
> >> rewritten to use the dict implementation. But the evidence that all
> >> implementations will always be fine with this restraint feels poor,
> >
> > I think you have a different definition of "poor" to me :-)
> 
> While I think "poor" is understating the case, I think "excellent"
> (which you use later on) is overstating it. My own characterisation
> would be "at least arguably good enough".

Fair enough, and thanks for elaborating.

-- 
Steve

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150292.html below:

[Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?