RetroSearch Browse

Mon Nov 6 13:40:19 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150247.html

On Nov 6, 2017, at 08:02, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> While discussions on the typing module are still hot, what do you
> think of allowing annotations in the standard libraries, but limited
> to a few basic types:

I’m still -1 on adding annotations to the stdlib, despite their increasing use out in the wild, for the reasons that Steve and David have pointed out.  (Let’s let Eric be the one that breaks the mold with data classes.  Then we can blame him!)

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171106/9bb15f19/attachment.sig>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-November/150247.html below:

[Python-Dev] Allow annotations using basic types in the stdlib?