On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:27:54PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > The ordered-ness of dicts could instead become one of those stable > CPython implementation details, such as the fact that resources are > cleaned up timely by reference counting, that people nevertheless > should not rely on if they're writing portable code. Given that (according to others) none of IronPython, Jython, Batavia, Nuitka, or even MicroPython, should have trouble implementing an insertion-order preserving dict, and that PyPy already has, why should we say it is a CPython implementation detail? -- Steve
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4