> On 4 Nov, 2017, at 3:39 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > > Lukasz Langa said: >> So, the difference is in perceived usability. It's psychological. > > Please, let's not start the "not in the stdlib isn't an issue" debate > again. If I concede it's a psychological issue, will you concede that > the fact that it's psychological doesn't mean that it's not a real, > difficult to solve, problem for some people? I'm also willing to > concede that it's a *minority* problem, if that helps. But can we stop > dismissing it as a non-existent problem? Paul, if you read the words I wrote in my e-mail verbatim, you will note that I am not saying it's not real or it's not important. Quite the opposite. Can you elaborate what made you think that my assertion that the issue is psychological made you think I'm being dismissive? To me it looks like you're aggressively agreeing with me, so I'd like to understand what caused your reaction. - Ł -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171105/701d457b/attachment.sig>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4