On 3 November 2017 at 14:50, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote: > 03.11.17 16:36, Guido van Rossum пише: >> Maybe we should remove typing from the stdlib? >> https://github.com/python/typing/issues/495 > > I didn't use typing, but AFAIK the most used feature from typing is > NamedTuple. If move NamedTuple and maybe other convenient classes not > directly related to typing into collections or types modules, I think > removing typing from the stdlib will less stress people. (Checks docs) Hmm, I'd missed that this was even in there. Regardless of what happens with the typing module, I think this should be moved. I expect there are many people who never looked at the docs of the typing module because they don't use type annotations. I know the class uses type annotations to define its attributes, but I don't see that as an issue. Data classes do the same, and they won't be in the typing module... Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4