RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 5 09:21:47 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-May/147875.html

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:24:27 +0900
> INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Nick and all core devs who are interested in this PEP.
>>
>> I'm reviewing PEP 538 and I want to accept it in this month.
>> It will reduces much UnicodeError pains which server-side OPs facing.
>> Thank you Nick for working on this PEP.
>>
>> If you have something worrying about this PEP, please post a comment
>> soon.  If you don't have enough time to read entire this PEP, feel free to
>> ask a question about you're worrying.
>
> From my POV, it is problematic that the behaviour outlined in PEP 538
> (see Abstract section) varies depending on the adoption of another PEP
> (PEP 540).
>
> If we want to adopt PEP 538 before pronouncing on PEP 540, then PEP 538
> should remove all points conditional on PEP 540 adoption, and PEP 540
> should later be changed to adopt those removed points as PEP
> 540-specific changes.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>

Fair enough.  I stop hurrying about PEP 538 and start reviewing PEP 540.

Thanks,

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-May/147875.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 538: Coercing the legacy C locale to a UTF-8 based locale