On 5/4/2017 10:43 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: >> What did not get done for 3.6 should be proposed for 3.7. > Anyone, feel free. The nightmare part is done, so this could be a case > where a PR actually pays off in terms of being able to use the > feature. There's no need for any unnecessary masochism (should there > ever be?). I have no idea what this means, but don't need to. >> Enhancing public APIs in normal (non-provisional) modules in bugfix releases >> has turned out to be a bad thing to do. Hence the policy to not do that. >> The few exceptions have been necessary to fix a bug that needed to be fixed, >> and could not reasonably be fixed otherwise. > > Such exceptions can of course more easily be made when the adoption of > a version is still small, and almost all users will never see X.Y.0 or > X.Y.1. This is not an allowed excuse for breaking the policy. The x.y language is defined when x.y.0 is released. Please stop. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4