RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 4 12:25:57 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-May/147856.html

On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:24:27 +0900
INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Nick and all core devs who are interested in this PEP.
> 
> I'm reviewing PEP 538 and I want to accept it in this month.
> It will reduces much UnicodeError pains which server-side OPs facing.
> Thank you Nick for working on this PEP.
> 
> If you have something worrying about this PEP, please post a comment
> soon.  If you don't have enough time to read entire this PEP, feel free to
> ask a question about you're worrying.

From my POV, it is problematic that the behaviour outlined in PEP 538
(see Abstract section) varies depending on the adoption of another PEP
(PEP 540).

If we want to adopt PEP 538 before pronouncing on PEP 540, then PEP 538
should remove all points conditional on PEP 540 adoption, and PEP 540
should later be changed to adopt those removed points as PEP
540-specific changes.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-May/147856.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 538: Coercing the legacy C locale to a UTF-8 based locale