Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147718.html below:

[Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 28 March 2017 at 17:31, Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote:
> IMO this is a bug, and depending on how many packages are affected it might
> even call for an emergency 3.6.2. The worst case is that we start getting
> large numbers of packages uploaded to pypi that claim to be 3.6.0 compatible
> but that crash like crash with an obscure error when people download them.

Has anyone logged this on bugs.python.org? There's nothing in the
Fedora bug referenced by the OP that indicates they've done so.

Paul

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What version is an extension module binary compatible with
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4