RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 27 06:43:22 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147687.html

2017-03-27 12:22 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com>:
> Should we to do something with this? Maybe add Py-prefixed aliases and
> temporary keep old names for compatibility (but allow to hide them if define
> a special macro)?

Is is possible to keep backward compatibility if an older version of
the stable ABI is explicitly requested?

Something like:

#if !defined(Py_LIMITED_API) || Py_LIMITED_API+0 < 0x03070000
#define getter _Py_getter
...
#endif

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147687.html below:

[Python-Dev] Not all public names in C API have the "Py" prefix