Hi! On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Freddy Rietdijk <freddyrietdijk at fridh.nl> wrote: > I would like to know if you're open to supporting `exec -a` or an Not everyone here knows what `exec -a` is so let me say that it's a bashism that sets program's name. `exec prog` is interpreted as a system call `exec('prog', 'prog')` and `exec -a name prog` is interpreted as `exec('prog', 'name')`. Currently sys.argv[0] is the name of the script and it should stay that way. But it would be interesting to preserve argv[0] from C and expose it via sys in addition to sys.executable. Something like sys.original_prog_name. Then the OP can do anything application-specific -- set sys.argv[0], call setproctitle, whatever. > Kind regards, > > Frederik Oleg. -- Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ phd at phdru.name Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4