RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 13 17:32:24 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147603.html

On 13 March 2017 at 11:56, Jaysinh Shukla <jaysinhp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Respected Members,
>
>     I identified the standard module 'tabnanny' is having 16.66% of code
> coverage (Source:
> https://codecov.io/gh/python/cpython/src/master/Lib/tabnanny.py). I am
> interested to write tests for this module. Before starting, I would like to
> get help from any core developer on this.
>
>
> 1. Is community expecting to have tests for this module?
> 2. Any module specific guidelines?
>
> I am waiting for green signal from any core developer. Thanks!

Try the people involved in the existing patches at
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19382> and
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19102>.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147603.html below:

[Python-Dev] Regarding writing tests for module tabnanny