These questions are best asked on the core-mentorship mailing list, Jaysinh, but to quickly answer your question: 1. Yes, tests would be appreciated. 2. Nothing from me On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 at 08:20 Jaysinh Shukla <jaysinhp at gmail.com> wrote: > Respected Members, > > I identified the standard module 'tabnanny' is having 16.66% of > code coverage (Source: > https://codecov.io/gh/python/cpython/src/master/Lib/tabnanny.py). I am > interested to write tests for this module. Before starting, I would like > to get help from any core developer on this. > > > 1. Is community expecting to have tests for this module? > 2. Any module specific guidelines? > > I am waiting for green signal from any core developer. Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170313/cd13c793/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4