RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 8 18:27:19 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147579.html

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:18:51PM -0500, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> On 3/8/2017 4:07 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:53:04AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a placeholder.
> >>>>The historical record would of course always be available in the vcs.
> >>>
> >>>   Thanks! That's what I've planned to do in case we don't remove PEPs.
> >>
> >>Why remove the content?
> >>
> >>In fact, since its just an informational PEP, why withdraw it? Some
> >>people find it too generic and not enough about Python -- okay. So what?
> >>
> >>Is PEP 103 actively harmful?
> >
> >   Certainly not!
> 
> I recommend adding a note to the top that the info, which correct, is
> somewhat obsolescent (or whatever) with the new workflow.  We have PEPs
> which are not 'wrong' in that they have been replaced by later PEPs, but we
> do not delete them, either in whole or in part.

   I see. Thanks!

> -- 
> Terry Jan Reedy

Oleg.
-- 
     Oleg Broytman            http://phdru.name/            phd at phdru.name
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147579.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can I revoke PEP 103 (info about git)?