RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 8 16:07:54 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147576.html

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:53:04AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> 
> > > It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a placeholder.
> > > The historical record would of course always be available in the vcs.
> > 
> >    Thanks! That's what I've planned to do in case we don't remove PEPs.
> 
> Why remove the content? 
> 
> In fact, since its just an informational PEP, why withdraw it? Some 
> people find it too generic and not enough about Python -- okay. So what?
> 
> Is PEP 103 actively harmful?

   Certainly not!

> -- 
> Steve

Oleg.
-- 
     Oleg Broytman            http://phdru.name/            phd at phdru.name
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147576.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can I revoke PEP 103 (info about git)?