RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 8 10:30:41 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147572.html

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:50:06AM -0500, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> On Mar 08, 2017, at 10:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 
> >Withdrawing the PEP is just a matter of submitting a PR to change the state
> >to Withdrawn, so it doesn't actually break any links. It's helpful to add a
> >short "PEP Withdrawal" section to say why it's withdrawn though, and you'd
> >be able to link to the wiki.python.org page from there.
> 
> We don't have a great Status for obsolete informational PEPs, so Withdrawn is
> about as good as it gets.  I've heard little parrots ask whether the whole PEP
> can just be deleted, implying the number could be reused in the future.  I
> *really* don't want for that to ever be possible.
> 
> Maybe change the status to "This is an Ex-PEP" or "This PEP is pining for the
> fiords".
> 
> It's also okay to remove much of the content and just leave a placeholder.
> The historical record would of course always be available in the vcs.

   Thanks! That's what I've planned to do in case we don't remove PEPs.

> Cheers,
> -Barry

Oleg.
-- 
     Oleg Broytman            http://phdru.name/            phd at phdru.name
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-March/147572.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can I revoke PEP 103 (info about git)?