On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:38:08PM +1000, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 18:33, Oleg Broytman <phd at phdru.name> wrote: > > > Hello! When I was writing PEP 103 I wanted to help to start using git. > > There were a few proponents and a few opponents: people expressed > > concerns that the PEP is too generic and isn't really related to Python > > development so I promised to revoke the PEP after the switch to git and > > Github. > > Now I think is the time. I hope revocation of the PEP wouldn't cause > > any problem? I'm gonna publish it at wiki.p.o. > > Withdrawing the PEP is just a matter of submitting a PR to change the state > to Withdrawn, so it doesn't actually break any links. It's helpful to add a > short "PEP Withdrawal" section to say why it's withdrawn though, and you'd > be able to link to the wiki.python.org page from there. Thanks! So the plan for me is to get editor rights for wiki, publish the text there and submit a PR. > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia Oleg. -- Oleg Broytman http://phdru.name/ phd at phdru.name Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4