On 03/03/2017 02:35 AM, Guyzmo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 04:13:17PM -0800, Ethan Furman wrote: >> The resulting enumeration is neither in alpha nor value order. While this >> has no bearing on programmatic usage I would like these Enums to be ordered, >> preferably by value. >> >> Would anyone prefer lexicographical ordering, and if so, why? > > I just tried on my system with python 3.6: > > ``` >>>> pprint(list(signal.Signals)) > [<Signals.SIGHUP: 1>, > <Signals.SIGINT: 2>, > <Signals.SIGQUIT: 3>, > <Signals.SIGILL: 4>, > <Signals.SIGTRAP: 5>, > <Signals.SIGABRT: 6>, > <Signals.SIGBUS: 7>, > <Signals.SIGFPE: 8>, > <Signals.SIGKILL: 9>, > <Signals.SIGUSR1: 10>, > <Signals.SIGSEGV: 11>, > <Signals.SIGUSR2: 12>, > <Signals.SIGPIPE: 13>, > <Signals.SIGALRM: 14>, > <Signals.SIGTERM: 15>, > <Signals.SIGCHLD: 17>, > <Signals.SIGCONT: 18>, > <Signals.SIGSTOP: 19>, > <Signals.SIGTSTP: 20>, > <Signals.SIGTTIN: 21>, > <Signals.SIGTTOU: 22>, > <Signals.SIGURG: 23>, > <Signals.SIGXCPU: 24>, > <Signals.SIGXFSZ: 25>, > <Signals.SIGVTALRM: 26>, > <Signals.SIGPROF: 27>, > <Signals.SIGWINCH: 28>, > <Signals.SIGIO: 29>, > <Signals.SIGPWR: 30>, > <Signals.SIGSYS: 31>, > <Signals.SIGRTMIN: 34>, > <Signals.SIGRTMAX: 64>] > ``` > > so I'm not sure what the issue is, but #worksforme. Ah, I see I tried it on 3.5 -- oops. Thanks for the clarification! -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4